In terms of change data capture (CDC), both MySQL binary logs and PostgreSQL write-ahead logs (WALs) can capture changes made to the database. While it has some support for extensions, MySQL has a different level of extensibility than PostgreSQL. Extensions: PostgreSQL has a robust extension framework that allows developers to add custom functionality and extend the core features of the database.MySQL, alternatively, primarily supports stored procedures written in SQL. PostgreSQL supports stored procedures written in various languages, including PL/pgSQL, PL/Tcl, PL/Perl, and more. Stored Procedures: PostgreSQL and MySQL support stored procedures, but the language and functionality of stored procedures differ.PostgreSQL may be better for applications requiring high concurrency or complex transaction logic. In contrast, MySQL's transaction management options are more limited. However, PostgreSQL offers evolved transaction management features such as transaction isolation levels, atomic transactions, and savepoints. Transactions: PostgreSQL and MySQL InnoDB utilize MVCC (Multi-Version Concurrency Control) to handle concurrent data access.MySQL has recently introduced a new replication model called Group Replication, but it is still a relatively new feature with some limitations. PostgreSQL supports multi-master replication, while MySQL primarily supports master-slave replication. Replication: PostgreSQL and MySQL support database replication, but the methods and options for replication differ.These provide more options for optimizing query performance and data retrieval.

PostgreSQL has a more refined indexing system than MySQL, including support for B-tree, GiST (Generalized Search Tree), and GIN (Generalized Inverted Index) indexes. Indexing: In MySQL, the default index type is B-tree, which is well-suited for most use cases.MySQL, while it has some geospatial support, could be more robust in this area. Geospatial Support: PostgreSQL strongly supports geospatial data, including a rich set of data types, functions, and operators for handling geographic data.On the other hand, MySQL has a more limited set of data types and is geared toward more straightforward web applications. Data Types: PostgreSQL supports a broader range of advanced data types, including arrays, hstore (a key-value store), and JSONB (binary JSON), which provide more flexible and efficient data storage options.PostgreSQL and MySQL both offer a wide range of features as relational database management systems, but there are some key differences between the two: Over time, Oracle acquired the open-source database management system MySQL and turned it into a commercial product. MySQL, on the other hand, was first released in 1995 and has been widely used for web-based applications due to its high performance and ease of use. It is known for its strong adherence to SQL standards, robust feature set, and focus on data integrity and security. PostgreSQL was first released in 1996 and has become a widely used open-source RDBMS. This article will compare PostgreSQL and MySQL to help you make an informed decision in 2023. However, they have different strengths and weaknesses that make one more suitable for specific use cases. Both have been around for decades and have proven highly reliable, secure, and scalable. Regarding choosing a relational database management system (RDBMS), two popular options are PostgreSQL and MySQL.

Postgresql vs mysql performance 2016